Weak On Security

The republicans have been running on security for a long time now. They tell us we're safe as long as they are in control, but are we?

Let me pose some questions to you and ask yourself which party is responsible:

Who was told months before 9/11 that terrorists would try to use planes to hit our buildings but did nothing in response to these warnings?

Who decided to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 using info from an unreliable source while ignoring Intel from its own agencies stating there was no proof that weapons of mass destruction existed but invaded that country anyway?

Who decided to fund this invasion with money borrowed from China while giving the top 2% a tax break? Does anyone care that our kids will be struck with this ever growing bill?

Who was in charge of our congress and presidency when North Korea announced their nuclear weapons?

Who directed our efforts to Iraq and ignored Pakistan where Al Queda has its home and there are nuclear weapons?

Who allowed the Bin Laden family to leave this country right after 9/11 on our military planes?

If you aren't brain dead you know our current administration is the answer to all of the questions. Now how does this add up to the republican party keeping us safe? Better yet, how does the democratic party make us weaker or unsafe when they haven't had a chance to control things in the first place.

I hope we are waking up to reality and not falling for the scare tactics of old. Remember John Kennedy and the Cuba missile crisis? Was this an example of Democratics being weak on security when we were on the brink of nuclear war and Kennedy told the Russians to remove their missles or else?

My friends, as John McCain likes to say, who is really weak on security after all the mistakes made by the republican controlled government. Is starting a war all it takes to get you to think this is how we are strong on security? Even if its wrong?

You comments are welcome,

Aloha Mike